“It is important to understand the multitude of factors involved. “Targeting the Magnuson-Stevens Act will not change some of these outcomes,” Frank said. While political rhetoric has focused on laws that protect fisheries - such as the Magnuson-Stevens Act - as the main culprit in underfishing, the researchers said it is important to take a nuanced view of the picture and view fisheries on a case-by-case basis. Some stocks are constrained by both market forces and policies, such as our Gulf of Mexico shrimp stocks that are struggling to compete with the price of imported shrimp coming from less regulated countries.” “Some stocks are constrained by other laws such as the Marine Mammal Protection Act or the Pacific Halibut Treaty with Canada. “Some healthy stocks are constrained by the Magnuson-Stevens Act because they are often caught with other stocks that are depleted,” Oremus said. Other, healthy fish stocks are being left in the water because they could not be profitably caught without also catching other fish species that are depleted. Of those, the majority of the revenue came from just one species: the walleye pollock, the catch of which is not constrained by the Magnuson-Stevens Act. Just four fish species - the Eastern Bering Sea walleye pollock, Atlantic sea scallop, Gulf of Mexico brown shrimp and Gulf of Mexico white shrimp - make up the majority of the revenue of those stocks that the researchers characterized as potentially less utilized and fished. are considered "underfished" is due to pure economics - fishers are not harvesting the fish because there is not enough demand for them. They found that the main reason about half of the fish stocks in the U.S. fishing law that it is too stringent and unnecessarily leaves too many fish in the water. In the study, Oremus, Frank, and their other co-authors examined the assertion of critics of U.S. These 170 managed fish stocks represent 85% of the U.S. The researchers examined two decades of data on 170 U.S. Oremus, assistant professor in the School of Marine Science and Policy, and Eyal Frank, an assistant professor at the University of Chicago Harris School of Public Policy, served as the lead authors on the paper. The paper found that the Magnuson-Stevens Act is not constraining most fisheries, and that there are various other reasons that lead to certain fish species being less fished. The University of Delaware’s Kimberly Oremus recently served as a lead author on a paper published in Science that examined U.S. However, the reauthorization of this act has been stalled in Congress for a decade, as some politicians blame the law for being too stringent, leading to what they call The primary way that the United States has protected its fisheries is through the Magnuson-Stevens Act, which was modernized in 1996 to foster the long-term biological and economic sustainability of marine fisheries. In the United States, commercial fishing employs 1.2 million Americans and generates more than $165 billion annually. Newswise - As warming waters threaten fish populations and disrupt fisheries around the world, it is critical to find ways to sustain fisheries while at the same time allowing those fisheries to remain economically viable to those who depend on them for their livelihoods.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |